PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -95.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.55%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -13.49%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-93.75%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.03%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 24.46%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
475.00%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -60.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-330.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BIDU at -26.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
93.85%
Some inventory rise while BIDU is negative at -104.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
144.94%
Lower AP growth vs. BIDU's 2366.10%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
79.25%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -136.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-2.21%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 127.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.69%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -21.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-34.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -19.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-116.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 255.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
6.21%
Some yoy expansion while BIDU is negative at -1.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
46.36%
We have some liquidation growth while BIDU is negative at -25.50%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
45.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 263.74%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
33.94%
Investing outflow well above BIDU's 4.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
99.10%
Debt repayment similar to BIDU's 96.57%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 99.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.