PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -157.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.28%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -66.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-232.73%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
22.90%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -21.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
120.81%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
140.60%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-122.34%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-154.91%
Both negative yoy AP, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
478.16%
Growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
21.21%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -25.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.60%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -81.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
34.50%
CapEx growth well above BIDU's 57.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-153.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-58.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
50.88%
We have some liquidation growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
17.24%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -150.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
21.64%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 59.79%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-500.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-14.15%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.