PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.42%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 837.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.50%
Less D&A growth vs. BIDU's 384.31%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1049.32%
Deferred tax of 1049.32% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.47%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 34.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-167.43%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-197.78%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
330.73%
Inventory growth of 330.73% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
95.76%
AP growth of 95.76% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-206.59%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-170.73%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 129.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
5.22%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 319.33%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-32.08%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 54.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-49.49%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-10.28%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.22%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
61.76%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -126.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-94.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -126.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-53.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.25%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.