PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.94%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -364.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.00%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-134.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.79%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BIDU at -25.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
328.63%
Well above BIDU's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
99.91%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1.62%
Inventory growth of 1.62% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
416.67%
AP growth of 416.67% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
111.98%
Growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
149.11%
Well above BIDU's 233.27%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.48%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 26.36%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-9.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
14.86%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. BIDU's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-52.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
72.70%
Liquidation growth of 72.70% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
589.09%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -22.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
14.44%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -22.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-215.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.