PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-35.94%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -99.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.94%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
184.13%
Deferred tax of 184.13% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
20.64%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -5.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-142.06%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
159.61%
AR growth of 159.61% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-182.41%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-202.58%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
93.40%
Growth of 93.40% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
226.03%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -53.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-20.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -80.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
0.78%
CapEx growth of 0.78% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
91.13%
Acquisition growth of 91.13% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-92.80%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
81.73%
Liquidation growth of 81.73% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
240.50%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -256.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
60.73%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -256.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4042.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.32%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.