PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.75%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 395.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-26.09%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-34.13%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.20%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -24.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-172.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
151.31%
AR growth of 151.31% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-175.75%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-201.97%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2.64%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-74.43%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -2624.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -31.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-350.27%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-0.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.36%
Liquidation growth of 10.36% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
152.63%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -704.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
26.07%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -704.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1543.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.