PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.32%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -102.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.97%
D&A growth of 6.97% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-65.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.55%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 41.16%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
29.36%
Working capital change of 29.36% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-231.03%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
200.96%
Inventory growth of 200.96% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
86.76%
AP growth of 86.76% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-217.68%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
42.25%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BIDU's 139.56%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
13.48%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 92.76%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
7.51%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BIDU's 108.14%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
81.51%
Acquisition growth of 81.51% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
32.70%
Purchases growth of 32.70% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-44.85%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-23.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -65.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-68.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -65.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-726.15%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.