PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.38%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -151.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.97%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-229.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.91%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -36.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
140.31%
Well above BIDU's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
175.00%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-305.10%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
63.55%
Growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
163.28%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -8.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
0.69%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -60.29%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-53.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 53.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
55.06%
Acquisition spending well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
28.44%
Purchases growth of 28.44% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-18.41%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
255.00%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -244.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
17.84%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -244.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-157.97%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.28%
Buyback growth below 50% of BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.