PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.64%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 510.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.09%
D&A growth of 3.09% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-2.73%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.17%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 52.76%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-570.12%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-145.12%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.61%
AP growth of 150.61% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-215.27%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-30.06%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -25.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.64%
Negative yoy CFO while BIDU is 311.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
30.23%
Some CapEx rise while BIDU is negative at -10.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-514.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
23.99%
Purchases growth of 23.99% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-13.71%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-37.75%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 49.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
53.74%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -24.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
19.84%
Debt repayment growth of 19.84% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.