PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -109.93%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.77%
D&A growth of 3.77% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
10.57%
Deferred tax of 10.57% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.06%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -20.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
118.88%
Working capital change of 118.88% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
95.07%
AR growth of 95.07% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.78%
AP growth of 58.78% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
70.60%
Growth of 70.60% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
40.07%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BIDU's 266.06%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
20.24%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BIDU's 13.41%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-6.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-431.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
21.63%
Purchases growth of 21.63% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
11.71%
Liquidation growth of 11.71% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
257.92%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 784.43%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
80.11%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 317.66%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-19.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.28%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.