PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.06%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 1472.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.83%
D&A growth of 3.83% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-0.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.49%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 14.85%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-63.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-4657.73%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.47%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
586.39%
Growth of 586.39% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
50.42%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -61.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.12%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -10.14%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.38%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 11.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
98.51%
Acquisition growth of 98.51% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
28.10%
Purchases growth of 28.10% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-52.11%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-71.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -133.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-647.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -166.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
44.71%
Debt repayment growth of 44.71% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.