PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.19%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
11.86%
D&A growth of 11.86% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
24.47%
Deferred tax of 24.47% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BIDU at -37.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-27.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
4.31%
AR growth of 4.31% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
1543.08%
Inventory growth of 1543.08% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-80.07%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-44.36%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
86.63%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -53.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
6.94%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -10.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -30.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.72%
Acquisition growth of 57.72% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
34.85%
Purchases growth of 34.85% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-14.37%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-170.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -182.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
33.80%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -265.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-12.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.