PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.07%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -61.10%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-58.87%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8.44%
Deferred tax of 8.44% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-1.46%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 28.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-585.17%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.05%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
174.06%
Inventory growth of 174.06% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
91.48%
AP growth of 91.48% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-489.07%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
160.57%
Well above BIDU's 271.51%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-38.30%
Negative yoy CFO while BIDU is 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-36.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -3.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
76.98%
Acquisition growth of 76.98% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-102.04%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
111.91%
Liquidation growth of 111.91% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
89.49%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -20.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
13.75%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -16.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-36.42%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.