PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.36%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.47%
D&A growth of 7.47% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
66.08%
Deferred tax of 66.08% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.32%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
28.10%
Working capital change of 28.10% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
53.19%
AR growth of 53.19% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.62%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
23.71%
Growth of 23.71% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-103.45%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 48.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
15.23%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -48.93%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.95%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-10488.46%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.12%
Purchases growth of 1.12% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-31.15%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1755.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -185.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-547.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -198.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
178.72%
Debt repayment growth of 178.72% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.51%
Buyback growth of 2.51% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.