PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.20%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
29.14%
D&A growth well above META's 11.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.47%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -271.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while META is negative at -147.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth well above META's 144.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-142.69%
Negative yoy usage while META is 93.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
336.54%
Well above META's 175.76%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
46.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 6.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
19.13%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -27.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -645.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-596.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -29.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while META is 20.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.