PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.15%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
19.11%
D&A growth well above META's 11.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
321.11%
Slight usage while META is negative at -271.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
321.11%
Growth well above META's 93.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
31.55%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 175.76%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
17.94%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 6.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-10.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -27.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.22%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -95.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-36.94%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 198.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.22%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -29.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.06%
Issuance growth of 119.06% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.