PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.69%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.96%
D&A growth well above META's 11.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
31.36%
SBC growth well above META's 16.57%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
33.27%
Slight usage while META is negative at -271.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-11.66%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -147.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
157.78%
Inventory growth of 157.78% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-55.20%
Negative yoy AP while META is 144.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-96.12%
Negative yoy usage while META is 93.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
133.31%
Well above META's 175.76%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
0.85%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 6.39%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
3.65%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -27.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-402.60%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
59.25%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -95.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-61.85%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 198.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -29.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.