PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.75%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x META's 10.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
16.27%
D&A growth well above META's 11.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-418.77%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
23.92%
SBC growth well above META's 16.57%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
59.40%
Slight usage while META is negative at -271.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-18.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -147.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.59%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-47.29%
Negative yoy AP while META is 144.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
218.10%
Growth well above META's 93.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-353.01%
Negative yoy while META is 175.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.71%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of META's 6.39%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-22.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -27.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
86.43%
Acquisition growth of 86.43% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
3.82%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -95.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-8.03%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 198.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.66%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -29.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.