PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.41%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 10.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.37%
Negative yoy D&A while META is 11.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
72.36%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -17.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.66%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 16.57%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
573.31%
Slight usage while META is negative at -271.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
207.09%
AR growth while META is negative at -147.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
653.54%
Inventory growth of 653.54% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-1215.75%
Negative yoy AP while META is 144.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-62.17%
Negative yoy usage while META is 93.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
59.29%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 175.76%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
23.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 6.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
35.27%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -27.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
113.12%
Acquisition growth of 113.12% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-38.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -95.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
8.88%
Below 50% of META's 198.35%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -29.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.