PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
272.04%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 10.17%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.59%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 11.33%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
87.16%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -17.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.04%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 16.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.86%
Slight usage while META is negative at -271.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
183.86%
AR growth while META is negative at -147.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-61.28%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
136.85%
AP growth well above META's 144.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-90.72%
Negative yoy usage while META is 93.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-105.16%
Negative yoy while META is 175.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
5.99%
Operating cash flow growth similar to META's 6.39%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
28.57%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -27.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
93.64%
Acquisition growth of 93.64% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
30.23%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -95.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-16.62%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 198.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.95%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -29.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.