PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 3.00%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
13.47%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 41.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-39.45%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 294.20%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.69%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 814.29%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-125.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -545.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-213.26%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -303.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
23000.00%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -5425.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
85.19%
Lower AP growth vs. META's 433.33%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-509.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -758.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-16.67%
Both negative yoy, with META at -316.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.94%
Some CFO growth while META is negative at -62.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 13.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-383.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -200.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-81.57%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
93.37%
Liquidation growth of 93.37% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
118.63%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -500.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-49.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -1228.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-99.96%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 81.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.