PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.94%
Some net income increase while META is negative at -5.42%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.13%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 34.72%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-64.57%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
31.26%
SBC growth well above META's 9.38%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
388.52%
Well above META's 178.81% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-8.78%
AR is negative yoy while META is 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-89.52%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 183.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-110.00%
Negative yoy AP while META is 190.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
381.48%
Growth well above META's 205.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-900.00%
Negative yoy while META is 82.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
12.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 337.98%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
25.85%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -3.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
31.75%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. META's 66.67%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-63.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 55.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
116.88%
Liquidation growth of 116.88% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
1863.16%
Growth well above META's 300.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
47.88%
Investing outflow well above META's 60.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
84.60%
Debt repayment above 1.5x META's 13.21%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.