PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.84%
Some net income increase while META is negative at -32.12%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.59%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 6.80%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
293.44%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -5.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.73%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 35.53%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-289.45%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 1000.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
133.11%
AR growth well above META's 163.73%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-291.52%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
482.76%
AP growth well above META's 90.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-66.24%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -129.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-209.09%
Both negative yoy, with META at -76.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.86%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with META at -13.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.17%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -144.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
83.27%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -31.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
51.29%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -208.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
8.46%
Below 50% of META's 43.24%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
123.38%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
278.79%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -1574.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
10.59%
We repay more while META is negative at -33.96%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.