PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.63%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 208.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.10%
D&A growth well above META's 27.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.02%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-6.04%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11.57%
Slight usage while META is negative at -560.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-82.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -60.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
527.78%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. META's 3500.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-15.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with META at -167.86%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
26.01%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 65.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-203.85%
Negative yoy while META is 101.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
16.61%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 172.40%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-16.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -15.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.52%
Acquisition spending well above META's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-10.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -5.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-24.68%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 39.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.35%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. META's 73200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-66.74%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 237.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-6.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -53.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.