PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.53%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 52.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.57%
Some D&A expansion while META is negative at -4.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-68.81%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 471.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
19.63%
SBC growth well above META's 31.76%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
128.81%
Less working capital growth vs. META's 394.44%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-175.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -314.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
88.73%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. META's 4392.31%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-282.76%
Negative yoy AP while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
147.48%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 1500.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-1452.63%
Negative yoy while META is 966.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
29.51%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 83.87%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-33.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 18.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
618.33%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -23.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-92.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -29.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
69.12%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x META's 15.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
72.70%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -133.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-55.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -52.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.33%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of META's 16.51%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.