PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.67%
Net income growth at 50-75% of META's 23.06%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
6.37%
D&A growth of 6.37% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-301.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.81%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 14.23%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
44.44%
Less working capital growth vs. META's 476.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-65.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -180.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-267.86%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 708.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-10.36%
Negative yoy AP while META is 326.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
186.12%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 649.02%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-433.33%
Both negative yoy, with META at -55.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.05%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 29.58%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
1.49%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -70.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-181.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -718.75%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-48.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -239.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
118.29%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -39.94%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
60.62%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -101.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
72.21%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -445.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
10.37%
Debt repayment well below META's 93.71%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.