PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.25%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 22.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.83%
Some D&A expansion while META is negative at -3.65%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
125.62%
Well above META's 98.28% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.66%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-231.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -41.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
131.30%
AR growth well above META's 145.06%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
113.83%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -106.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-44.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with META at -123.26%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-195.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -95.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-247.32%
Both negative yoy, with META at -125.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-16.17%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-3.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 24.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2355.83%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
11.21%
Purchases well above META's 3.10%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-37.27%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 25.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
250.10%
Growth well above META's 93.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-351.89%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 26.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.