238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
69.11%
Some net income increase while META is negative at -13.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-18.10%
Negative yoy D&A while META is 49.83%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
209.44%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -4600.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.98%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 139.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-141.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -7.58%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-3097.22%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -90.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
1834.62%
Inventory growth well above META's 101.89%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
532.28%
AP growth well above META's 133.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-125.26%
Negative yoy usage while META is 178.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-642.98%
Negative yoy while META is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.17%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 26.84%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-46.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -7.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
111.38%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -474.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
27.55%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -66.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
12.42%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -79.44%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-298.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -109.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
65.25%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -320.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.42%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x META's 10.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.