PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.62%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 40.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.84%
D&A growth well above META's 0.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-411.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 70.40%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-5.90%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
55.92%
Slight usage while META is negative at -98.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-209.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -435.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
223.33%
Inventory growth well above META's 34.36%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-1458.33%
Negative yoy AP while META is 306.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
64.71%
Growth well above META's 37.84%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-39.29%
Both negative yoy, with META at -83.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
5.56%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of META's 10.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
14.08%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -9.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-21.88%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 90.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-53.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 18.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
66.65%
Below 50% of META's 163.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
192.50%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -8.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
30.13%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. META's 80.17%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2.66%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 21.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.