PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.22%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 24.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.13%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 5.88%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-88.24%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
26.50%
SBC growth while META is negative at -0.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-114.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 10650.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
65.19%
AR growth well above META's 26.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-17.43%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 146.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
161.50%
A yoy AP increase while META is negative at -129.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-176.48%
Negative yoy usage while META is 153.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-151.28%
Negative yoy while META is 500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-14.00%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
5.65%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -42.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-30.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -8.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-11.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -90.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.08%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -9.90%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-44.79%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 57.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-13.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -485.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-7.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 37.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.