238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.72%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 74.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.50%
D&A growth well above META's 11.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
193.03%
Well above META's 67.89% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.28%
SBC growth while META is negative at -1.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1275.36%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -77.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-558.43%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -174.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-14.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with META at -0.46%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
61.30%
Lower AP growth vs. META's 222.22%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.71%
Negative yoy usage while META is 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
266.33%
Some yoy increase while META is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
6.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 28.97%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
11.50%
CapEx growth well above META's 11.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
107.84%
Acquisition spending well above META's 85.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
20.55%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -17.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-17.71%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 57.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-246.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -24.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
5.67%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. META's 17.39%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
6.87%
Debt repayment well below META's 47.83%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.