PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.54%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with META at -3.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.35%
Negative yoy D&A while META is 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.98%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. META's 47.15%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.04%
SBC growth well above META's 0.13%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
90.94%
Well above META's 135.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
146.53%
AR growth well above META's 147.01%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-252.34%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with META at -106.37%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with META at -81.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
124.62%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -106.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
111.04%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 333.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
19.38%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 5.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -63.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-525.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-13.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 44.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.34%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -28.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
69.33%
Growth well above META's 32.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-13.81%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 38.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.82%
We repay more while META is negative at -2500.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
We cut yoy buybacks while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.