PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.37%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 49.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.70%
D&A growth well above META's 3.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
35.92%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -1447.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.75%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-64.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 170.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-708.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -299.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
93.04%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. META's 56300.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-127.89%
Negative yoy AP while META is 94.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
125.20%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 57200.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
300.00%
Well above META's 75.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.39%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 37.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -15.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-162.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 32.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
45.81%
Purchases well above META's 35.68%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-24.98%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -24.88%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.75%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -362.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
63.96%
Investing outflow well above META's 36.64%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
95.26%
Debt repayment growth of 95.26% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.