PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
91.03%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 20.88%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
8.37%
D&A growth well above META's 6.18%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-294.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-9.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with META at -2.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-200.70%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 16.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-37.56%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -18.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.66%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 70.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-481.25%
Negative yoy AP while META is 210.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
142.95%
Growth well above META's 76.74%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
235.71%
Some yoy increase while META is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
33.35%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 14.33%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-24.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -21.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-209.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -1125.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-97.06%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 12.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
90.71%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x META's 39.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-96.04%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 40.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-100.84%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 31.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7021.05%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while META is negative at -326.67%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.