238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-144.86%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with META at -9.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
15.05%
D&A growth well above META's 10.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
105.41%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -139.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
1.48%
SBC growth while META is negative at -19.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
3361.19%
Well above META's 810.91% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-165.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
11304.55%
Inventory growth well above META's 2316.18%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
1203.28%
AP growth well above META's 61.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
875.50%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 2057.24%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-48.94%
Both negative yoy, with META at -28.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.01%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 25.16%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-21.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -28.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
89.23%
Acquisition spending well above META's 82.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
63.38%
Purchases well above META's 15.96%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-58.91%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -41.68%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-33.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -90.32%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
51.58%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -34.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
40.32%
Debt repayment growth of 40.32% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while META is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.