PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.01%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.45%
D&A growth well above META's 8.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-672.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 314.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.79%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 24.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
226.76%
Slight usage while META is negative at -213.01%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-118.35%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -179.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
412.16%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -324.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-218.85%
Negative yoy AP while META is 4800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-239.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -356.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
71.35%
Well above META's 25.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-12.97%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with META at -19.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.96%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -23.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
85.28%
Acquisition spending well above META's 67.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-59.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -5.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
71.24%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -4.36%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-36.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 107700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
57.00%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -85.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.48%
Debt repayment growth of 14.48% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.57%
We have some buyback growth while META is negative at -88.78%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.