PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
187.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 0.61%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
11.40%
D&A growth well above META's 7.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
733.09%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -70.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.58%
Both cut yoy SBC, with META at -12.31%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-103.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 115.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-114.74%
AR is negative yoy while META is 22.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-71.59%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 221.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
317.93%
A yoy AP increase while META is negative at -24.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1.18%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 212.68%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-41.25%
Both negative yoy, with META at -70.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.38%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 19.00%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
3.56%
CapEx growth well above META's 3.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
90.22%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -350.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-0.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -2.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-43.33%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -33.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
5.26%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -100.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-208.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -78.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
80.79%
Debt repayment growth of 80.79% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -27.08%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.