PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 7.70%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
8.50%
D&A growth well above META's 10.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1049.32%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -99.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.47%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 29.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-167.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -26.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-197.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -194.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
330.73%
Inventory growth well above META's 2.27%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
95.76%
AP growth well above META's 108.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-206.59%
Negative yoy usage while META is 24.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-170.73%
Negative yoy while META is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
5.22%
Some CFO growth while META is negative at -7.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-32.08%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-49.49%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 94.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-10.28%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 21.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.22%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 30.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
61.76%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -28.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-94.04%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 40.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-53.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -13.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -86.79%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.