PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.94%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 132.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.00%
Some D&A expansion while META is negative at -5.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-134.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 17400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.79%
Both cut yoy SBC, with META at -4.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
328.63%
Slight usage while META is negative at -89.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
99.91%
AR growth well above META's 67.40%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1.62%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -62.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
416.67%
Lower AP growth vs. META's 1012.50%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
111.98%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -86.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
149.11%
Well above META's 233.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.48%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 8.03%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-9.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
14.86%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -233.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-52.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -43.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
72.70%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x META's 21.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
589.09%
Growth well above META's 84.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
14.44%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -25.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-215.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -1.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -0.26%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.