PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x META's 20.65%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
16.88%
D&A growth well above META's 3.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
12.97%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -325.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.80%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 1.92%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-172.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -275.14%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-436400.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -417.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
264.67%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -45.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
1328.07%
AP growth well above META's 25.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-2601.59%
Negative yoy usage while META is 67.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-161.93%
Both negative yoy, with META at -120.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.72%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with META at -2.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
10.10%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -16.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -4350.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
46.03%
Purchases well above META's 35.68%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-32.27%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -10.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-68.07%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 730.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.42%
Investing outflow well above META's 20.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
67.59%
Debt repayment above 1.5x META's 2.08%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -12.89%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.