PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-35.94%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with META at -33.30%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.94%
Negative yoy D&A while META is 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
184.13%
Well above META's 220.76% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
20.64%
SBC growth well above META's 4.87%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-142.06%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 542.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
159.61%
AR growth well above META's 220.57%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-182.41%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with META at -25.59%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-202.58%
Both negative yoy AP, with META at -139.29%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
93.40%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -30.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
226.03%
Well above META's 200.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-20.63%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 21.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
0.78%
Lower CapEx growth vs. META's 13.22%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
91.13%
Acquisition spending well above META's 92.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-92.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -65.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
81.73%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x META's 40.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
240.50%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -166.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
60.73%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -1.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4042.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 29.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.32%
We cut yoy buybacks while META is 3.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.