PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.80%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 5.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.94%
D&A growth well above META's 6.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-437.71%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.99%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 26.97%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
178.67%
Slight usage while META is negative at -284.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-103.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -105.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
130.26%
Some inventory rise while META is negative at -786.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
117.49%
A yoy AP increase while META is negative at -27.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
529.81%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -800.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-233.76%
Negative yoy while META is 616.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.20%
Some CFO growth while META is negative at -64.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.22%
CapEx growth well above META's 8.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
13.16%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -927.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
28.45%
Purchases well above META's 21.63%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-42.30%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -21.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-71.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -483.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-357.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -1.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.20%
We repay more while META is negative at -9.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.35%
We have some buyback growth while META is negative at -9.44%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.