PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.39%
Net income growth at 75-90% of META's 42.99%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
7.10%
D&A growth well above META's 9.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1127.94%
Well above META's 74.97% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.88%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 3.60%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
125.13%
Slight usage while META is negative at -937.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-51.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -711.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
40.55%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. META's 1294.12%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
129.29%
A yoy AP increase while META is negative at -140.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
348.82%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 770.90%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-58.65%
Negative yoy while META is 785.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.37%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of META's 42.86%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-1.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -25.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2746.15%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 98.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
10.68%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. META's 59.40%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
11.18%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -27.39%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
85.96%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -800.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
52.09%
Investing outflow well above META's 68.84%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.56%
We repay more while META is negative at -8.47%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -11.83%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.