PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.32%
Net income growth under 50% of META's 9.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.97%
D&A growth well above META's 0.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-65.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.55%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 39.23%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
29.36%
Slight usage while META is negative at -34.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-231.03%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -260.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
200.96%
Inventory growth well above META's 68.12%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
86.76%
AP growth well above META's 146.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-217.68%
Negative yoy usage while META is 68.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
42.25%
Well above META's 68.18%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
13.48%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 8.20%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.51%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -7.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
81.51%
Acquisition growth of 81.51% while META is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
32.70%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -65.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-44.85%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 24.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-23.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -2950.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-68.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -68.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-726.15%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 18.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -79.72%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.