PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.22%
Some net income increase while META is negative at -11.55%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.19%
D&A growth well above META's 0.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-439.58%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.87%
SBC growth while META is negative at -6.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
422.16%
Well above META's 173.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
34.20%
AR growth well above META's 59.37%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-58.45%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 281.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
283.08%
AP growth well above META's 498.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
405.35%
Growth well above META's 294.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
27.57%
Some yoy increase while META is negative at -247.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x META's 6.38%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-24.07%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
15.91%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. META's 62.16%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-40.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 24.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
46.81%
At 50-75% of META's 70.37%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
1586.96%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -91.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-10.76%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 95.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
17.43%
We repay more while META is negative at -87.80%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.45%
We have some buyback growth while META is negative at -90.11%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.