PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.01%
Net income growth at 75-90% of META's 11.87%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
4.09%
D&A growth well above META's 0.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
225.56%
Well above META's 195.17% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.07%
SBC growth well above META's 1.13%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.29%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 89.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-141.55%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -267.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
226.80%
Inventory growth well above META's 215.79%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
386.13%
AP growth well above META's 26.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-190.58%
Negative yoy usage while META is 204.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-19.01%
Negative yoy while META is 146.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.37%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 28.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
6.39%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -24.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-48.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -433.67%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-16.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.84%
Below 50% of META's 49.68%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-74.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -5.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-9.61%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 1866.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
0.42%
Debt repayment well below META's 25.54%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -49.06%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.