PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with META at -10.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.09%
Some D&A expansion while META is negative at -8.21%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2.73%
Negative yoy deferred tax while META stands at 19.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.17%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 34.15%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-570.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -83.80%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-145.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -120.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.61%
AP growth well above META's 126.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-215.27%
Negative yoy usage while META is 146.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-30.06%
Negative yoy while META is 185.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.64%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with META at -13.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
30.23%
Some CapEx rise while META is negative at -39.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-514.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 57.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
23.99%
Purchases well above META's 45.43%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-13.71%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -42.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-37.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -106.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
53.74%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -45.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
19.84%
Debt repayment above 1.5x META's 6.01%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while META is 44.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.