PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with META at -34.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.77%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 9.90%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
10.57%
Some yoy growth while META is negative at -142.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.06%
SBC growth while META is negative at -6.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
118.88%
Well above META's 27.70% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
95.07%
AR growth well above META's 79.89%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.78%
A yoy AP increase while META is negative at -109.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
70.60%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -129.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
40.07%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 173.54%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
20.24%
Some CFO growth while META is negative at -20.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-6.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -23.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-431.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while META stands at 90.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
21.63%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -16.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
11.71%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -28.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
257.92%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. META's 614.29%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
80.11%
We have mild expansions while META is negative at -39.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-19.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while META is 25.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -21.42%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.