PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.06%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.83%
Less D&A growth vs. META's 9.24%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-0.21%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.49%
SBC growth while META is negative at -4.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-63.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while META is 240.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-4657.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -1517.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.47%
Negative yoy AP while META is 4081.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
586.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. META's 39414.29%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
50.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 619.15%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
1.12%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of META's 49.74%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-4.38%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
98.51%
Some acquisitions while META is negative at -82.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
28.10%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. META's 71.47%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-52.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with META at -0.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-71.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 44.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-647.54%
We reduce yoy invests while META stands at 22.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
44.71%
We repay more while META is negative at -44.17%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -8.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.