PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.38%
Some net income increase while META is negative at -11.76%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
118.36%
D&A growth well above META's 6.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
125.09%
Well above META's 60.72% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-6.98%
Negative yoy SBC while META is 4.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
76.02%
Well above META's 117.55% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
148.59%
AR growth well above META's 188.64%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while META is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-597.42%
Both negative yoy AP, with META at -287.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
65.06%
Some yoy usage while META is negative at -152.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
225.76%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. META's 642.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
52.51%
Some CFO growth while META is negative at -0.81%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.01%
Negative yoy CapEx while META is 16.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-110.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -12.50%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
25.26%
Some yoy expansion while META is negative at -487.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.10%
We reduce yoy sales while META is 96.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
253.03%
We have some outflow growth while META is negative at -202.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-38.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -34.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
43.13%
We repay more while META is negative at -2.61%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.06%
We have some buyback growth while META is negative at -152.57%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.